The article criticizes a minister who accumulates a long list of lawsuits, irregularities, and abuse of power. The text mentions that it's not worth repeating all these cases, suggesting they are widely known.
The central point of the criticism is that this minister, despite this history, decided that his mission is to combat populism. The article questions the coherence of this position.
The prime minister is also targeted by criticism for keeping this minister in office. The article accuses him of pretending that the situation makes sense, without having the courage to remove the minister.
The article title summarizes the author's opinion: a "minister without sense" and a "prime minister without courage."




