A man was the victim of a brutal aggression that originated over a cigarette. The case involves a criminal proceeding in which the differentiation of guilt among each participant is at stake.
Lawyer Pedro Proença criticized the Public Prosecutor's actions, stating that this entity was "very generous with these individuals" in handling the case.
According to Pedro Proença, the Public Prosecutor still has time to review the images of the incident and re-evaluate the facts. The lawyer argues that it is possible and necessary to differentiate the guilt of each participant in the criminal proceedings.
The lawyer emphasizes that reviewing the images may allow for a better understanding of the role of each person involved in the aggression, thus enabling a fairer decision by the Public Prosecutor.
