The article addresses the need for reform in the education system. The title suggests this should be a priority, followed by other changes.
The text establishes a comparison between the protection adults have and what should be offered to children and adolescents. Adults have a legal limit of 35 to 40 hours of weekly work as a way to protect the human condition.
The central argument defends that children and adolescents deserve the same safeguard. Specifically, they should be protected against exhaustion, analogous to the existing labor protection for adults.
The article appears to advocate that education reform should prioritize student well-being, ensuring they are not subjected to excessive workloads that compromise their development.
