The article addresses the need for continuity of some State policies beyond electoral cycles. It argues that, although unanimity should not be sought on all matters, there are choices that transcend political majorities and that should deserve longer-lasting understanding.
The text argues that a change in governing majority should not imply starting everything over, recognizing that some decisions of national interest benefit from broader and more stable consensus.
The piece appears to be a reflection text on governance and institutional stability, without identifying specific events, people or situations that motivated its writing.
