According to Quaest survey, 45% of voters point to candidates' proposals as the most decisive factor in defining their vote. The candidate's ideology is decisive for only 17% of those surveyed, while 14% consider television performance relevant.
However, the article points out that this presidential campaign should not be marked by proposals, but rather by a dispute of ideas and, above all, by a confrontation between candidates. This is a campaign of confrontation, not of proposals.
The survey reveals a paradox: although voters say they value proposals, the campaign scenario suggests that the confrontation between candidates should predominate over programmatic discussion.
