Justices Gilmar Mendes and André Mendonça had a heated argument during a session of the Federal Supreme Court (STF) this Tuesday. Senior Justice Gilmar Mendes accused his colleague André Mendonça of adopting a "political electoral" tone in handling the Master case, related to PET 16.662. Gilmar especially criticized the choice of the judgment date, which fell on September 7th, as well as the presence of dolls with Mendonça's face at rallies by supporters of presidential candidate Flávio Bolsonaro from the PL party, known as "pixuleco." In response, Mendonça said Gilmar was being "careless" with his accusations. Gilmar countered by stating that "decent people don't do that," without completing the sentence. The case involves disagreements over procedural conduct and accusations of political interference in the court's decisions.
Politics
Investments
Elections
Gilmar and Mendonça argue in session at the STF, and senior justice states that colleague adopted 'political electoral' conduct in Master case
extra15 September 2026 at 17:10
Why this matters
The confrontation between two of the STF's leading justices reveals internal tensions at the court that could affect the handling of sensitive cases. For Brazilian readers, this is relevant because the Master case involves political and electoral matters intersecting with judicial decisions, and the public disagreement between justices could signal divisions about how the court should handle politically charged cases.
About this summary
This is our short summary of a report published by extra on 15 September 2026 at 17:10; the full text stays with the publisher. In our feed it sits under Politics. We currently carry 30735 items in that section.
All items in this section →Related articles


Politics
FESAP demands minimum salary increase and meal allowance increase in the State
15/09/26, 19:50
Politics
Operation Teia: Former mayors of Santo Tirso and Barcelos silent at start of trial
15/09/26, 19:47


