Lawyer Garcia Pereira accused a judge of the Constitutional Court of violating legal duties by pronouncing herself on a request for dissolution of the Chega party. The position was considered "unacceptable" by Garcia Pereira, who argues that a member of a higher court should not pronounce herself on a matter that may be decided by that body. The case arises in the context of a request for dissolution of the Chega party, whose decision may fall to the Constitutional Court itself. The issue raises a debate about impartiality and the ethical and legal limits that should govern members of higher courts when they pronounce on cases that may be analyzed by their own institutions.
Politics
Garcia Pereira accuses Constitutional Court judge of violating legal duties by speaking about request for dissolution of Chega
Público14 September 2026 at 12:34
Why this matters
This case is relevant for Portuguese readers because it raises questions about the impartiality and integrity of the Constitutional Court in a process that could lead to the dissolution of a political party. Garcia Pereira's accusation highlights concerns about the separation of powers and compliance with legal duties by members of higher courts.
About this summary
This is our short summary of a report published by Público on 14 September 2026 at 12:34; the full text stays with the publisher. In our feed it sits under Politics. We currently carry 29533 items in that section.
All items in this section →Related articles
Politics
Ministry of Education considers opening new classes or increasing students per classroom
14/09/26, 15:30




