The article, titled "The passion for the lie - and the dreamed Brazil," raises questions about paradoxes in electoral behavior in Brazil. The piece presents a series of rhetorical questions about why different social groups vote for candidates who appear to act against their own interests.
The text questions why women vote for misogynistic politicians, immigrants for xenophobes, Black people for racists, homosexuals for homophobes, religious people for bigots, and poor people for representatives who deepen inequality.
The article does not offer answers to these questions, functioning as promotional content with restricted access. The piece ends with a notice that it is exclusive content for subscribers, inviting readers to sign up for full access.
