Gilmar Mendes defends that analysis of PF director's removal be done in plenaryPhoto by benelhadj1970 on Pexels
Politics
Выборы
Setúbal

Gilmar Mendes defends that analysis of PF director's removal be done in plenary

cbn8 September 2026 at 21:40

Minister Gilmar Mendes of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) defended that the analysis of the removal of the Federal Police director, André Rodrigues, should be done in a plenary session and not in the court's second panel. Earlier, he requested a view (pause for consideration) in the trial to endorse the single-judge decision by André Mendonça, who had determined the removal.

In his vote, Gilmar Mendes stated that the impact of the removal decision may cause imbalances in the political-electoral dispute. This statement served to justify the view request, which is the additional time granted for a more thorough analysis of the case.

According to the court's rules, a view request can last up to 90 days, but the expectation is that the return by Gilmar Mendes will occur within a much shorter timeframe. The minister himself expressed interest in returning the case quickly.

Gilmar Mendes's statement also aims to pressure for the case to be brought to the full STF, where all ministers will participate in the decision, instead of being decided solely by the second panel.

Related articles

Acidente/Elevador: Chega distrai-se e moção do BE para exigir respostas é aprovada na AML
Politics

Accident/Elevator: Chega gets distracted and BE's motion demanding answers is approved at AML

The Lisbon Municipal Assembly approved a motion by the Left Bloc demanding answers from the City Council regarding the Glória elevator tragedy, with votes against from PSD, CDS-PP and Iniciativa Liberal. The motion was ultimately approved due to the distraction of Chega's deputies, who intended to vote against but were unable to do so in time.

SAPO Notícias08/09/26, 22:48
Quatro verdades e mentiras do debate da moção de censura
Politics

Four truths and lies from the censorship motion debate

SIC Verifica analyzed the censorship motion debate in the Portuguese assembly, separating truths from lies exchanged between parties during the exchanges of accusations and calls for resignation that marked the session.

SIC Notícias08/09/26, 22:40
Politics

Government presents new measures "because it feels the need to silence this political debate"

The Vice-President of the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, Duarte Cordeiro, stated that Tuesday's parliamentary debate was intended by the Government to divert attention and contain the political impact of the hearings on Minister Luís Neves, considering that the new measures presented by the executive emerged as a way to "silence this political debate". The opposition questioned the scheduling of the measures and the Government's timing, which announced these initiatives hours before a debate convened by the opposition on the justice situation.

Now08/09/26, 22:39
Politics

"Luís Neves' topic "is not being taken advantage of by the political class. It seems they are afraid, that it is a topic that burns""

To journalists from Nascer do Sol, Felília Cabrita criticized the political class for not raising the appropriate questions to the Minister of Internal Administration, Luís Neves, during Tuesday's parliamentary hearing. According to the journalist, the topic associated with Neves "is not being taken advantage of" by the deputies, suggesting that there is fear in addressing the issue, which she considers "burning".

CNN Portugal08/09/26, 22:39