The text addresses the issue of informality in the management of what is public, pointing to a culture of relaxation in the administration of goods and resources that belong to all citizens.
The author warns that this informal posture in public management arouses suspicions about possible abuses and improper advantages on the part of those who administer these resources.
The central criticism falls on the lack of rigor and formality in dealing with money and public affairs, which, according to the text, compromises transparency and society's trust in institutions.
The article suggests that informality creates an environment conducive to questionable practices, where the boundaries between legitimate use and abuse of public power become blurred.
