The central issue of the article is the use of texts written by artificial intelligence or other artificial means that are subsequently signed by someone who did not produce them. The author argues that accepting and signing prose that does not represent the recognizable expression of who signs it implies a renunciation of what would be the authorial mark.
The article maintains that, by accepting this type of practice, one implicitly assumes that only the content of the text matters, disregarding form as a distinctive element of an author's identity. This represents a fundamental shift in the understanding of what it means to produce and publish a text.
The author reflects on the ethical and journalistic implications of this practice, questioning the legitimacy of texts without genuine authorial expression in the context of journalistic production. The signature, in this case, loses its traditional meaning of linking author and work.
The article's conclusion is that texts produced artificially and signed by third parties should not have a place in newspapers, since they violate the fundamental principle of the relationship between who writes and what is written.
