Luís Neves is the central figure of this defense against accusations from the Public Ministry. His statements arise in a context where he is confronted with decisions that were allegedly made informally.
Neves states that informality is a practice that happens much more frequently than the public imagines. He defends that none of the decisions made was aimed at enriching any person involved.
The Public Ministry appears to have opened a process or investigation against Luís Neves and others involved, but he contradicts the version presented by the Public Ministry. The defense focuses on the absence of intent to benefit personally from the referenced actions.




